You Acted on the Feedback. Did Anyone Notice?
A Number That Should Stop Every Leader Cold
Ask executives whether they act on the feedback they collect from employees, and 85 to 95% say absolutely. Ask the people who actually gave that feedback, and the score drops by 30 to 50 points. Same organization. Same feedback. A completely different story about what happened next.
That gap surfaced in a recent conversation between Kirkpatrick Partners CEO Vanessa Milara Alzate and Dr. Benjamin Granger, Chief Workplace Psychologist at Qualtrics, on The Kirkpatrick Podcast. And it isn’t a one-off. Granger’s team sees this same spread show up across organizations, year after year. It is one of the most reliable findings in all of employee research — and one of the most misread.
It’s Not An Action Gap. It’s A Communication Gap.
The instinctive explanation is that leaders are all talk: they ask for input and then sit on it. But the data points somewhere more useful — and more hopeful. Most of the time, this isn’t an action gap at all. Leaders do respond. They adjust budgets, change policies, rework programs, escalate concerns. What they fail to do is connect the dots out loud between what people said and what changed.
That distinction matters because the two problems have completely different fixes. If your people genuinely aren’t acting on feedback, you have a leadership discipline problem, and those are slow and expensive to solve. If they’re acting but not communicating, you have a storytelling problem — and that one you can fix this quarter, with no new survey platform and no new budget. The lever is simple to name and surprisingly hard to pull consistently: close the loop.
Why The Loop Keeps Breaking
Closing the loop sounds obvious. So why does it fail so reliably, even in well-run organizations? Three reasons tend to compound.
First, leaders confuse doing the work with showing the work. Once a decision is made and the change is underway, it feels finished from the top of the house. From the frontline, nothing visible has happened, so the natural conclusion is that nothing did.
Second, the feedback and the response get separated by weeks or months. By the time a change rolls out, no one remembers — or no one is told — that it traces back to a survey people filled out two quarters ago. The cause and the effect never get introduced to each other.
Third, organizations treat communication as the optional last step rather than part of the work itself. It’s the line that gets cut when the calendar gets tight. And it’s precisely the line that determines whether the entire measurement effort builds trust or quietly erodes it.
The Harder Case: When You Can’t Disclose The Details
There’s a more demanding version of this challenge that deserves real attention. Sometimes you’re acting on feedback in ways you can’t fully disclose — navigating internal politics, working a decision through channels, laying groundwork that isn’t public yet, or protecting something that has to stay confidential for now.
The temptation is to say nothing until it’s all resolved. But silence doesn’t read as discretion to the people waiting. It reads as indifference. The discipline is learning to say “we heard you, and we’re on it” in a way that’s honest about progress without exposing what can’t yet be shared. Vanessa learned this firsthand on the board of a membership organization that ran a major survey of alumni engagement. The results were clear, and the board got to work — quietly, navigating constraints they couldn’t make public. What they never did was tell the people who responded that anything was happening at all. To everyone who took the time to weigh in, it looked like their feedback had vanished into a void. The work was real. The communication wasn’t.
The Real Engine Behind Survey Fatigue
This is also, as Granger points out, the true driver of survey fatigue — and it reframes a problem most organizations are trying to solve with the wrong tools. We assume people stop responding because surveys are too long or too frequent. Those things matter; his research is clear that overly long surveys drive measurable drop-off, especially on mobile. But the deeper force is what he calls survey-in-action fatigue. People disengage not because the survey exhausted them, but because the last several seemed to change nothing.
Every unclosed loop teaches your organization a quiet lesson: responding is pointless. Every closed loop teaches the opposite. Over time, those lessons compound into either a workforce that tells you the truth or one that stops bothering — and you rarely notice the shift until your response rates and your candor have both quietly collapsed.
Closing The Loop Is A Discipline, Not A Courtesy
In the Kirkpatrick world, communication loops sit at the center of building a culture of evaluation, right alongside courage and psychological safety. They are not a nicety you extend after the real work is done. They are the real work. A few principles make them stick:
Close the loop on a cadence, not a whim. Make “communicate the action” a named step in your evaluation process, with an owner, the way you’d treat data collection or analysis.
Connect the response to the original ask, explicitly. “You told us X. Here’s what we changed.” The sentence is almost embarrassingly simple, and almost no one says it.
Communicate progress, not just completion. People don’t need the change finished to feel heard. They need to know it’s moving.
This is also where evaluation stops being a measurement exercise and becomes a leadership one. The Four Levels® were never meant to end at data collection. Reaction and Learning are only worth gathering if they inform Behavior and Results — and feedback only changes behavior when people can see it lead somewhere. Closing the loop is how measurement converts into Return on Expectations rather than another report no one acts on.
The Quiet Truth
Collecting feedback is the easy part. Telling people what you did with it is where the trust — and the performance — actually gets built. Data earns its keep only when people can see it move something, and trust is the precondition for every honest answer you’ll ever collect.
Evaluation is the unlock for the future of organizational health and performance. But only if you close the loop.
Find Out Where Your Organization Stands
The Enterprise Performance Intelligence Maturity Assessment gives you a detailed picture of your organization’s maturity across governance, measurement and evaluation, performance thinking, leadership alignment, and more — with specific recommendations on what to prioritize next.
Every organization that completes the assessment is also welcome to a complimentary 30-minute strategy call to work through their first 90 days.
Take the assessment today.
